Judge upholds Ghislaine Maxwell’s sex trafficking conviction
Warning: Undefined variable $post_id in /home/webpages/lima-city/booktips/wordpress_de-2022-03-17-33f52d/wp-content/themes/fast-press/single.php on line 26

A trial judge has concluded there was sufficient proof to convict Ghislaine Maxwell of sex trafficking
By LARRY NEUMEISTER Related Press
29 April 2022, 22:26
• 3 min learn
Share to FacebookShare to TwitterEmail this textNEW YORK -- A decide concluded Friday that there was enough proof to convict British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell of intercourse trafficking women for financier Jeffrey Epstein to sexually abuse, but she additionally gave Maxwell a legal victory by concluding that three conspiracy counts charged the identical crime and she can only be sentenced for one.
U.S. District Judge Alison J. Nathan stated in her written ruling that the jury’s guilty verdicts had been “readily supported” by in depth witness testimony and documentary evidence at a one-month trial that concluded in December.
Legal professionals for Maxwell had asked her to reject the verdict on a number of grounds, together with insufficient proof.
Maxwell, 60, was convicted of recruiting teenage girls for financier Jeffrey Epstein to sexually abuse from 1994 to 2004.
Nathan said that she'll only sentence Maxwell in late June on three of the 5 counts she was convicted on after concluding that two conspiracy counts have been duplicates of the third.
“This authorized conclusion by no means calls into query the factual findings made by the jury. Fairly, it underscores that the jury unanimously discovered — thrice over — that the Defendant is responsible of conspiring with Epstein to entice, transport, and site visitors underage women for sexual abuse,” Nathan wrote.
The discount of counts from five to three was not anticipated to have a lot impact on the sentencing, when Maxwell might face a sentence starting from several years to decades in jail.
Legal professionals for Maxwell did not return messages requesting comment. Prosecutors declined remark.
Earlier this month, the judge refused to toss out Maxwell's conviction after a juror disclosed to other jurors during jury deliberations that he had been sexually abused as a baby even though he had not revealed that fact in response to questions about prior intercourse abuse posed in a written questionnaire.
The juror had said he “skimmed manner too fast” by the questionnaire and did not deliberately give the mistaken reply to a query about sex abuse.
In refusing to toss the decision, Nathan stated the juror’s failure to disclose his prior sexual abuse through the jury choice course of was highly unlucky, however not deliberate.
The choose also concluded the juror “harbored no bias towards the defendant and could function a good and impartial juror.”
Maxwell, arrested in July 2020, has remained incarcerated. Epstein was 66 when he took his personal life in a federal jail cell in August 2019 as he awaited a sex trafficking trial.